AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs ATI Radeon HD 4830

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP and ATI Radeon HD 4830 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
• 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 95 Watt
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 77 vs 56

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4830

• Around 44% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 5.8x more texture fill rate: 18.4 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
• 5x more pipelines: 640 vs 128
• 7.2x better floating-point performance: 736.0 gflops vs 102.4 gflops
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 844 vs 266
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 1631
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 1631

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4830

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	266 844
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	77 56
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1631 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1631 3354

Compare specifications (specs)