AMD Radeon HD 8400E vs NVIDIA NVS 5400M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8400E and NVIDIA NVS 5400M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400E
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7310 vs 2085
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 April 2013 vs 1 June 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7310 vs 2085 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5400M
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 660 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 625 vs 276
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 187 vs 113
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1652 vs 980
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1652 vs 980
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2282 vs 1665
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2282 vs 1665
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 660 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 625 vs 276 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 vs 113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1652 vs 980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1652 vs 980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2282 vs 1665 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2282 vs 1665 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8400E
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 5400M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8400E | NVIDIA NVS 5400M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 276 | 625 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 113 | 187 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7310 | 2085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 980 | 1652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 980 | 1652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1665 | 2282 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1665 | 2282 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.068 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 229.562 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.384 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.696 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1069 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1069 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8400E | NVIDIA NVS 5400M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Kalindi | GF108 |
Launch date | 23 April 2013 | 1 June 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1442 | 1444 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 660 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,178 million | 585 million |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops | |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Texture fill rate | 10.56 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | MXM |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |