NVIDIA GeForce 810M vs AMD Radeon HD 8400E
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 810M and AMD Radeon HD 8400E videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 810M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 738 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 407 vs 276
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1833 vs 980
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3035 vs 1665
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 vs 980
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3035 vs 1665
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 March 2014 vs 23 April 2013 |
Core clock speed | 738 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 407 vs 276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 vs 980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3035 vs 1665 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 vs 980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3035 vs 1665 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400E
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 113 vs 67
- 4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7310 vs 1644
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 113 vs 67 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7310 vs 1644 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 810M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8400E
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 810M | AMD Radeon HD 8400E |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 407 | 276 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 67 | 113 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1644 | 7310 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.403 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 131.239 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1076 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 | 980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3035 | 1665 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1076 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 | 980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3035 | 1665 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 810M | AMD Radeon HD 8400E | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GF117 | Kalindi |
Launch date | 24 March 2014 | 23 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1439 | 1442 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 738 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 141.7 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Texture fill rate | 5.904 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,178 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 |