AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher core clock speed: 875 MHz vs 650 MHz
• Around 67% higher texture fill rate: 7 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
• 10x more pipelines: 160 vs 16
• 8.3x better floating-point performance: 280.0 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
• Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 872 vs 538
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.365 vs 12.009

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 347 vs 263
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 174
• 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 vs 2.021
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 155.638 vs 104.327
• 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 vs 0.239
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.36 vs 5.628
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 754 vs 672
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 vs 1078
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 2093
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 vs 672
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 1078
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 2093

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	263 347
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	174 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	872 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.021 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	104.327 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.239 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.628 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.365 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	672 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1078 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2093 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	672 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1078 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2093 2392

Compare specifications (specs)