AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 7.3x more core clock speed: 875 MHz vs 120 MHz
  • 5x more pipelines: 160 vs 32
  • 3.5x better floating-point performance: 280.0 gflops vs 80 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
  • Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 263 vs 140
  • 6.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 174 vs 28
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2093 vs 1679
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2093 vs 1679
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 July 2013 vs 4 June 2008
Core clock speed 875 MHz vs 120 MHz
Pipelines 160 vs 32
Floating-point performance 280.0 gflops vs 80 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 263 vs 140
PassMark - G2D Mark 174 vs 28
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2093 vs 1679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2093 vs 1679

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT

  • Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 8 GTexel / s vs 7 GTexel / s
  • Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1140 vs 1078
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1140 vs 1078
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 8 GTexel / s vs 7 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 23 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1140 vs 1078
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1140 vs 1078

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
263
140
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
174
28
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1078
1140
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2093
1679
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1078
1140
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2093
1679
Name AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
PassMark - G3D Mark 263 140
PassMark - G2D Mark 174 28
Geekbench - OpenCL 871
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.021
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 104.327
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 5.628
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 23.365
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 672
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1078 1140
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2093 1679
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 672
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1078 1140
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2093 1679

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 Tesla
Code name Caicos G96
Launch date 23 July 2013 4 June 2008
Place in performance rating 1536 1533
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 875 MHz 120 MHz
Floating-point performance 280.0 gflops 80 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 160 32
Texture fill rate 7 GTexel / s 8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 23 Watt
Transistor count 370 million 314 million
CUDA cores 32

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-II
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None None
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.4 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR2, GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
PCI-E 2.0