AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 7.3x more core clock speed: 875 MHz vs 120 MHz
- 5x more pipelines: 160 vs 32
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 280.0 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 263 vs 140
- 6.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 174 vs 28
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2093 vs 1679
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2093 vs 1679
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 4 June 2008 |
Core clock speed | 875 MHz vs 120 MHz |
Pipelines | 160 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 280.0 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 263 vs 140 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 vs 28 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2093 vs 1679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2093 vs 1679 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 8 GTexel / s vs 7 GTexel / s
- Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1140 vs 1078
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1140 vs 1078
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s vs 7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1140 vs 1078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1140 vs 1078 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 263 | 140 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 | 28 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 871 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.021 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.327 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.239 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.628 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.365 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 672 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1078 | 1140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2093 | 1679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 672 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1078 | 1140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2093 | 1679 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Caicos | G96 |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 4 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1536 | 1533 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 875 MHz | 120 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 280.0 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 7 GTexel / s | 8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 314 million |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |