AMD Radeon HD 8550G vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8550G and NVIDIA Quadro K1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8550G
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 256 vs 192
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2459 vs 2297
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2459 vs 2297
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 March 2013 vs 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 256 vs 192 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2459 vs 2297 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2459 vs 2297 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
- Around 65% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 515 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1717 vs 1234
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1162 vs 753
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1162 vs 753
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1695 vs 1397
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1695 vs 1397
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 250 vs 118
- Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 779 vs 412
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 515 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1717 vs 1234 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1162 vs 753 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1162 vs 753 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1695 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1695 vs 1397 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 250 vs 118 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 779 vs 412 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8550G
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8550G | NVIDIA Quadro K1000M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1234 | 1717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 753 | 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 753 | 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1397 | 1695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1397 | 1695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2459 | 2297 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2459 | 2297 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 118 | 250 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 412 | 779 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.636 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 115.549 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.454 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.024 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.485 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8550G | NVIDIA Quadro K1000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Terascale 3 | Kepler |
Code name | Richland | GK107 |
Launch date | 12 March 2013 | 1 June 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1400 | 1402 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119.90 | |
Price now | $149.90 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 720 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 515 MHz | 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 192 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 13.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs |