AMD Radeon HD 8650G vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8650G and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8650G
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1876
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1876
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 May 2013 vs 3 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 128 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 65 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 1876 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 1876 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 1463 MHz vs 533 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 153 vs 140
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 576 vs 518
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1463 MHz vs 533 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 153 vs 140 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 576 vs 518 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8650G
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 8650G | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1735 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 736 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 736 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2062 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2062 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 1876 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 1876 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 140 | 153 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 518 | 576 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 8650G | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Terascale 3 | Tesla |
| Code name | Richland | G92 |
| Launch date | 1 May 2013 | 3 March 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1272 | 1275 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 720 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 533 MHz | 1463 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 128 |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Floating-point performance | 374.5 gflops | |
| Gigaflops | 562 | |
| Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 754 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-IV | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 61 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Display Connectors | HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortLVDSVGA | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| PureVideo HD | ||
| SLI | ||