AMD Radeon HD 8650G vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8650G and NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8650G
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 May 2013 vs 1 April 2013 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3352 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 837 MHz vs 533 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3468 vs 1735
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2255 vs 736
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2255 vs 736
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3133 vs 2062
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3133 vs 2062
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 179 vs 140
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1097 vs 518
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 837 MHz vs 533 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3468 vs 1735 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2255 vs 736 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2255 vs 736 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3133 vs 2062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3133 vs 2062 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 179 vs 140 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1097 vs 518 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8650G
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 8650G | NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1735 | 3468 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 736 | 2255 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 736 | 2255 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2062 | 3133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2062 | 3133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3352 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 140 | 179 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 518 | 1097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.489 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 202.905 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.66 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.184 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.323 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 8650G | NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Terascale 3 | Kepler |
| Code name | Richland | GK107 |
| Launch date | 1 May 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1272 | 1273 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 720 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 533 MHz | 837 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 642.8 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 26.78 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||