AMD Radeon R7 M260DX vs AMD Radeon HD 8650G

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260DX and AMD Radeon HD 8650G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260DX

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 74% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 533 MHz
  • Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 940 MHz vs 720 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
  • 10x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18010 vs 1796
  • Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1047 vs 736
  • Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1047 vs 736
  • Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 138
  • Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 817 vs 526
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 October 2014 vs 1 May 2013
Core clock speed 925 MHz vs 533 MHz
Boost clock speed 940 MHz vs 720 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 32 nm
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 18010 vs 1796
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1047 vs 736
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1047 vs 736
PassMark - G2D Mark 195 vs 138
PassMark - G3D Mark 817 vs 526

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8650G

  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2062 vs 1019
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2062 vs 1019
  • Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2165
  • Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2165
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2062 vs 1019
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2062 vs 1019
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 2165
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 2165

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8650G

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
18010
1796
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1047
736
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1047
736
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1019
2062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1019
2062
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2165
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2165
3353
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
195
138
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
817
526
Name AMD Radeon R7 M260DX AMD Radeon HD 8650G
Geekbench - OpenCL 18010 1796
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1047 736
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1047 736
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1019 2062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1019 2062
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2165 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2165 3353
PassMark - G2D Mark 195 138
PassMark - G3D Mark 817 526

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 M260DX AMD Radeon HD 8650G

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Terascale 3
Code name Topaz Richland
Launch date 12 October 2014 1 May 2013
Place in performance rating 1267 1269
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 940 MHz 720 MHz
Core clock speed 925 MHz 533 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 3,100 million
Pipelines 384

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 11
OpenGL 4.5

Memory

Shared memory 1