AMD Radeon R7 M260DX vs AMD Radeon HD 8650G
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260DX and AMD Radeon HD 8650G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 74% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 533 MHz
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 940 MHz vs 720 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 10x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18010 vs 1796
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1047 vs 736
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1047 vs 736
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 138
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 817 vs 526
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 October 2014 vs 1 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 533 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 940 MHz vs 720 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18010 vs 1796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 vs 736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 vs 736 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 vs 138 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 817 vs 526 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8650G
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2062 vs 1019
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2062 vs 1019
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2165
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2165
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2062 vs 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2062 vs 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 2165 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 2165 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8650G
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M260DX | AMD Radeon HD 8650G |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18010 | 1796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 | 736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 | 736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1019 | 2062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1019 | 2062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2165 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2165 | 3353 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 138 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 817 | 526 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M260DX | AMD Radeon HD 8650G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Terascale 3 |
Code name | Topaz | Richland |
Launch date | 12 October 2014 | 1 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1267 | 1269 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 940 MHz | 720 MHz |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 533 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 |