AMD Radeon HD 8650G vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8650G and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8650G
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3176
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3176
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 May 2013 vs 22 March 2012 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3176 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3176 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 835 MHz vs 533 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 950 MHz vs 720 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4030 vs 1731
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1094 vs 736
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1094 vs 736
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2253 vs 2062
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2253 vs 2062
- Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 266 vs 139
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1445 vs 524
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 835 MHz vs 533 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz vs 720 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4030 vs 1731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1094 vs 736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1094 vs 736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2253 vs 2062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2253 vs 2062 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 266 vs 139 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1445 vs 524 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8650G
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8650G | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1731 | 4030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 736 | 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 736 | 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2062 | 2253 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2062 | 2253 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3176 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3176 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 139 | 266 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 524 | 1445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 405.086 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.098 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.798 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 33.754 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 475 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8650G | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Terascale 3 | Kepler |
Code name | Richland | GK107 |
Launch date | 1 May 2013 | 22 March 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1276 | 1277 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 720 MHz | 950 MHz |
Core clock speed | 533 MHz | 835 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Floating-point performance | 729.6 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 30.4 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |