AMD Radeon HD 8790M vs ATI FirePro V5800
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8790M and ATI FirePro V5800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8790M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 690 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1306 vs 1176
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 272
- Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4742 vs 3088
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2181 vs 2135
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2181 vs 2135
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 April 2013 vs 26 April 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 690 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1306 vs 1176 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 vs 272 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4742 vs 3088 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2181 vs 2135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2181 vs 2135 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V5800
- Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 27.6 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 800 vs 384
- Around 60% better floating-point performance: 1,104.0 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3319 vs 2656
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2014
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3319 vs 2656
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2014
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 27.6 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 800 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3319 vs 2656 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 2014 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3319 vs 2656 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 2014 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8790M
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V5800
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 8790M | ATI FirePro V5800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1306 | 1176 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 | 272 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4742 | 3088 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.759 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.631 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.576 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.839 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 80.418 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2181 | 2135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2656 | 3319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2014 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2181 | 2135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2656 | 3319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2014 | 3352 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1607 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 8790M | ATI FirePro V5800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Mars | Juniper |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
| Launch date | 1 April 2013 | 26 April 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 860 | 862 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $479 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 690 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,104.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 800 |
| Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 27.6 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,040 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 74 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 8790M with others
AMDRadeon HD 8790M vs
ATIRadeon HD 3300 IGP
AMDRadeon HD 8790M vs
ATIFirePro V5800
AMDRadeon HD 8790M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6790
AMDRadeon HD 8790M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M
AMDRadeon HD 8790M vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650
AMDRadeon HD 8790M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M390
