NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M vs AMD Radeon HD 8790M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M and AMD Radeon HD 8790M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 3x more texture fill rate: 63.76 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 960 vs 384
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 1,530 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2798 vs 1306
- Around 84% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8632 vs 4679
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.528 vs 12.759
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 731.755 vs 465.631
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.486 vs 1.576
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.15 vs 28.839
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.659 vs 80.418
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4133 vs 2181
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 2656
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 vs 2014
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4133 vs 2181
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 2656
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 vs 2014
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 May 2013 vs 1 April 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 63.76 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 960 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,530 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2798 vs 1306 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8632 vs 4679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.528 vs 12.759 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 731.755 vs 465.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.486 vs 1.576 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.15 vs 28.839 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.659 vs 80.418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4133 vs 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 vs 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 vs 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4133 vs 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 vs 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 vs 2014 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8790M
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 811 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 850 MHz vs 797 MHz
- 2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 339
- Around 67% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1607 vs 964
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 811 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 850 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 vs 339 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1607 vs 964 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8790M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | AMD Radeon HD 8790M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2798 | 1306 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 339 | 751 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8632 | 4679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.528 | 12.759 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 731.755 | 465.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.486 | 1.576 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.15 | 28.839 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.659 | 80.418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4133 | 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 | 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4133 | 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 | 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 2014 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 964 | 1607 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | AMD Radeon HD 8790M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK106 | Mars |
Launch date | 30 May 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $189.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 860 | 861 |
Price now | $177.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.67 | |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 797 MHz | 850 MHz |
Core clock speed | 811 MHz | 850 MHz |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,530 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 960 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 63.76 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,040 million |
Compute units | 6 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA |