AMD Radeon HD 8790M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8790M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8790M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 800x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 412
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.839 vs 28.29
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 80.418 vs 47.404
• Around 82% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1607 vs 881

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 850 MHz
• 2.7x more texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 21.6 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
• 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
• Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2528 vs 1306
• Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7923 vs 4746
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.168 vs 12.759
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 592.345 vs 465.631
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.141 vs 1.576
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 vs 2181
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 2656
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 2014
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 vs 2181
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 2656
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 vs 2014

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8790M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1306 2528
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	751 412
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4746 7923
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.759 23.168
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	465.631 592.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.576 2.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.839 28.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	80.418 47.404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2181 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2656 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2014 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2181 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2656 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2014 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1607 881

Compare specifications (specs)