NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M600M and AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 200 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 8 January 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 200 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3348 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
- 5.8x more texture fill rate: 103.6 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 4.7x more pipelines: 1792 vs 384
- 3.8x better floating-point performance: 3,315 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2817 vs 2171
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 374 vs 337
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13719 vs 5983
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4396 vs 2945
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4396 vs 2945
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 3681
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 3681
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 103.6 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,315 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2817 vs 2171 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 vs 337 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13719 vs 5983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4396 vs 2945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4396 vs 2945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 3681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 3681 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M600M | AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2171 | 2817 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 337 | 374 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5983 | 13719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2945 | 4396 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2945 | 4396 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3348 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.311 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.334 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.328 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.205 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 181.508 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M600M | AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 8 January 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 679 | 682 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 3,315 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1792 |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 103.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 240.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro M600M with others
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1000
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 210S
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8950 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4200
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
AMDFirePro W5170M
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
AMDRadeon Pro 455
