AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs AMD FirePro W7170M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and AMD FirePro W7170M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 94% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 723 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4979 vs 3162
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 2 October 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 723 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4979 vs 3162 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7170M
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1704 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 418 vs 371
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 50809 vs 22636
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 vs 1715
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3722 vs 1177
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 vs 1724
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 vs 1715
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3722 vs 1177
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 vs 1724
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1704 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 418 vs 371 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 50809 vs 22636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 vs 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 vs 1177 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 1724 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 vs 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 vs 1177 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 1724 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7170M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | AMD FirePro W7170M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4979 | 3162 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 418 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22636 | 50809 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.628 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1762.559 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.26 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.313 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 617.099 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1715 | 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1177 | 3722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1724 | 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1715 | 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1177 | 3722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1724 | 3362 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | AMD FirePro W7170M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Vega 10 | Amethyst |
| Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 2 October 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 682 | 420 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12,500 million | 5,000 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 1704 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU with others
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
ATIFireGL V5100
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
ATIRadeon X600 PRO
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
IntelHD Graphics P4600
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4200
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX350
