AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 771 MHz
  • Around 91% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 784 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4979 vs 4327
  • Around 97% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23955 vs 12186
  • 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 102.628 vs 33.016
  • 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1762.559 vs 736.063
  • 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.26 vs 2.73
  • 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.313 vs 31.588
  • 8.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 617.099 vs 70.194
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 June 2017 vs 22 July 2014
Core clock speed 1400 MHz vs 771 MHz
Boost clock speed 1500 MHz vs 784 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 4979 vs 4327
Geekbench - OpenCL 23955 vs 12186
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 102.628 vs 33.016
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1762.559 vs 736.063
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.26 vs 2.73
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 86.313 vs 31.588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 617.099 vs 70.194

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200

  • 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 108 Watt vs 300 Watt
  • 3.2x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1704 MHz
  • Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 503 vs 371
  • 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6373 vs 1715
  • 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3382 vs 1177
  • Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3311 vs 1724
  • 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6373 vs 1715
  • 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3382 vs 1177
  • Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3311 vs 1724
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 108 Watt vs 300 Watt
Memory clock speed 5400 MHz vs 1704 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 503 vs 371
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6373 vs 1715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3382 vs 1177
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3311 vs 1724
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6373 vs 1715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3382 vs 1177
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3311 vs 1724

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4200

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
4979
4327
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
371
503
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
23955
12186
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
102.628
33.016
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1762.559
736.063
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7.26
2.73
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
86.313
31.588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
617.099
70.194
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1715
6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1177
3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1724
3311
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1715
6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1177
3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1724
3311
Name AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU NVIDIA Quadro K4200
PassMark - G3D Mark 4979 4327
PassMark - G2D Mark 371 503
Geekbench - OpenCL 23955 12186
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 102.628 33.016
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1762.559 736.063
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.26 2.73
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 86.313 31.588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 617.099 70.194
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1715 6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1177 3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1724 3311
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1715 6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1177 3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1724 3311
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.0 Kepler
Code name Vega 10 GK104
Launch date 27 June 2017 22 July 2014
Place in performance rating 700 702
Type Desktop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $854.99
Price now $446.99
Value for money (0-100) 11.92

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1500 MHz 784 MHz
Core clock speed 1400 MHz 771 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 300 Watt 108 Watt
Transistor count 12,500 million 3,540 million
Floating-point performance 2,107 gflops
Pipelines 1344
Texture fill rate 87.81 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 267 mm 241 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Memory clock speed 1704 MHz 5400 MHz
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 172.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory type GDDR5