AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 771 MHz
• Around 91% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 784 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4979 vs 4326
• Around 97% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 24023 vs 12186
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 102.628 vs 33.016
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1762.559 vs 736.063
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.26 vs 2.73
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.313 vs 31.588
• 8.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 617.099 vs 70.194

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200

• 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 108 Watt vs 300 Watt
• 3.2x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1704 MHz
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 502 vs 371
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6373 vs 1715
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3382 vs 1177
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3311 vs 1724
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6373 vs 1715
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3382 vs 1177
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3311 vs 1724

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4979 4326
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	371 502
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	24023 12186
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	102.628 33.016
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1762.559 736.063
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.26 2.73
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	86.313 31.588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	617.099 70.194
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1715 6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1177 3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1724 3311
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1715 6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1177 3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1724 3311

Compare specifications (specs)