AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 771 MHz
- Around 91% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 784 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4979 vs 4327
- Around 97% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23955 vs 12186
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 102.628 vs 33.016
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1762.559 vs 736.063
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.26 vs 2.73
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.313 vs 31.588
- 8.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 617.099 vs 70.194
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 22 July 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 771 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 784 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4979 vs 4327 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23955 vs 12186 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.628 vs 33.016 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1762.559 vs 736.063 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.26 vs 2.73 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.313 vs 31.588 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 617.099 vs 70.194 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 108 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1704 MHz
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 503 vs 371
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6373 vs 1715
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3382 vs 1177
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3311 vs 1724
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6373 vs 1715
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3382 vs 1177
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3311 vs 1724
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1704 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 503 vs 371 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6373 vs 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3382 vs 1177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3311 vs 1724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6373 vs 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3382 vs 1177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3311 vs 1724 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4979 | 4327 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 503 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23955 | 12186 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.628 | 33.016 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1762.559 | 736.063 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.26 | 2.73 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.313 | 31.588 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 617.099 | 70.194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1715 | 6373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1177 | 3382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1724 | 3311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1715 | 6373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1177 | 3382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1724 | 3311 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Vega 10 | GK104 |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 22 July 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 700 | 702 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $854.99 | |
Price now | $446.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.92 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 784 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 771 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 108 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 3,540 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,107 gflops | |
Pipelines | 1344 | |
Texture fill rate | 87.81 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 1704 MHz | 5400 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 172.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |