AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 92% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 92% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 780 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4979 vs 1076
- 4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23543 vs 5903
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 30 June 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4979 vs 1076 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 vs 370 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23543 vs 5903 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 6% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1704 MHz
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3341 vs 1177
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 1724
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3341 vs 1177
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 1724
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1704 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3341 vs 1177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 1724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3341 vs 1177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 1724 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4979 | 1076 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 370 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23543 | 5903 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.628 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1762.559 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.26 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.313 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 617.099 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1177 | 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1724 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1177 | 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1724 | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Vega 10 | Oland |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 30 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 701 | 703 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 780 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 730 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 1,040 million |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 1704 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3 |