AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs AMD FirePro D300
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and AMD FirePro D300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 65% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 850 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23955 vs 20137
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 102.628 vs 51.183
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1762.559 vs 1192.547
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.26 vs 5.209
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.313 vs 78.541
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 617.099 vs 242.179
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 18 January 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23955 vs 20137 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.628 vs 51.183 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1762.559 vs 1192.547 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.26 vs 5.209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.313 vs 78.541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 617.099 vs 242.179 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D300
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 3x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 1704 MHz
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6054 vs 1715
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3397 vs 1177
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1724
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6054 vs 1715
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3397 vs 1177
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1724
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 1704 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6054 vs 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3397 vs 1177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 1724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6054 vs 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3397 vs 1177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 1724 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D300
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | AMD FirePro D300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4979 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23955 | 20137 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.628 | 51.183 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1762.559 | 1192.547 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.26 | 5.209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.313 | 78.541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 617.099 | 242.179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1715 | 6054 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1177 | 3397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1724 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1715 | 6054 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1177 | 3397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1724 | 3351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | AMD FirePro D300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Vega 10 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 18 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 700 | 703 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 2,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,176 gflops | |
Pipelines | 1280 | |
Texture fill rate | 68 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 242 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 1704 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 162.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |