AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs NVIDIA GeForce 945M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 and NVIDIA GeForce 945M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1029 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- 12.9x more texture fill rate: 384.0 GTexel / s vs 29.81 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 4096 vs 512
- 12.9x better floating-point performance: 12,288 gflops vs 953.9 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6958 vs 2961
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6958 vs 2961
- 8.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70814 vs 8099
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 27 October 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1029 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s vs 29.81 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops vs 953.9 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6958 vs 2961 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6958 vs 2961 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70814 vs 8099 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 945M
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 6% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1704 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1634
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1634
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 1846
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 1846
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1704 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 1634 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 1634 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 vs 1846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 vs 1846 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 | NVIDIA GeForce 945M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6958 | 2961 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6958 | 2961 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1634 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1634 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1846 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1846 | 3343 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70814 | 8099 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2109 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 380.461 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.027 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 | NVIDIA GeForce 945M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Vega 10 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 27 October 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 571 | 961 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | 953.9 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s | 29.81 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12,500 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 482.8 GB / s | 16.02 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1704 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 with others
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6610 XL
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
ATIRadeon E2400
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870M
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
AMDRadeon R9 260 OEM
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
NVIDIAGRID K120Q
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
NVIDIACMP 50HX
