AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 and NVIDIA Quadro M1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1072 MHz
Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
Around 23% better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 1,017 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2048x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 432 vs 307
Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10611 vs 8849
Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.134 vs 721.18
Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.305 vs 42.938
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4551 vs 4196
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4551 vs 4196

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 June 2017 vs 18 August 2015
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz vs 1072 MHz
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops vs 1,017 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	432 vs 307
Geekbench - OpenCL	10611 vs 8849
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	864.134 vs 721.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	49.305 vs 42.938
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4551 vs 4196
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4551 vs 4196
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3358

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Around 7% higher core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 925 MHz
Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 65 Watt
Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2835 vs 2629
Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.33 vs 29.959
Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.056 vs 2.893
Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 137.786 vs 122.245
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3607
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3607

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	993 MHz vs 925 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2835 vs 2629
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.33 vs 29.959
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.056 vs 2.893
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	137.786 vs 122.245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716 vs 3607
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716 vs 3607

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2629

2835

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

432

307

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

10611

8849

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

29.959

38.33

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

864.134

721.18

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.893

3.056

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

49.305

42.938

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

122.245

137.786

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4551

4196

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3607

3716

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4551

4196

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3607

3716

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3358

Name	AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	2629	2835
PassMark - G2D Mark	432	307
Geekbench - OpenCL	10611	8849
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	29.959	38.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	864.134	721.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.893	3.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	49.305	42.938
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	122.245	137.786
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4551	4196
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3607	3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4551	4196
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3607	3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1002

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell
Code name	Lexa	GM107
Launch date	12 June 2017	18 August 2015
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	$200.89
Place in performance rating	704	806
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Price now		$203.37
Value for money (0-100)		16.10
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz	1072 MHz
Core clock speed	925 MHz	993 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops	1,017 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	512
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s	31.78 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	40 Watt
Transistor count	2,200 million	1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	145 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model		5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB / 4 GB
Memory bandwidth	96 GB / s	80 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus