AMD Radeon Pro 460 vs ATI FirePro V9800
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 460 and ATI FirePro V9800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 460
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 7.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 4600 MHz
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3453 vs 2727
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 679 vs 655
- 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.089 vs 9.718
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.46 vs 0.867
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 55.755 vs 27.153
- Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 226.93 vs 118.756
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 October 2016 vs 9 September 2010 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 4600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3453 vs 2727 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 679 vs 655 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.089 vs 9.718 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.46 vs 0.867 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 55.755 vs 27.153 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 226.93 vs 118.756 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V9800
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 68.0 GTexel / s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 1600 vs 1024
- Around 46% better floating-point performance: 2,720.0 gflops vs 1,858 gflops
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 738.1 vs 594.914
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 68.0 GTexel / s vs 58.05 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1600 vs 1024 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,720.0 gflops vs 1,858 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 738.1 vs 594.914 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 460
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V9800
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 460 | ATI FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3453 | 2727 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 679 | 655 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15221 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.089 | 9.718 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 594.914 | 738.1 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.46 | 0.867 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 55.755 | 27.153 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 226.93 | 118.756 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4664 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1842 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4664 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1842 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 460 | ATI FirePro V9800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Baffin | Cypress |
| Launch date | 30 October 2016 | 9 September 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 629 | 627 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,499 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 907 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 2,720.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1600 |
| Texture fill rate | 58.05 GTexel / s | 68.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 2,154 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB / s | 147.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 460 with others
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
ATIRadeon X550
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
ATIFireGL V5600
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
ATIFirePro V9800
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6990
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
NVIDIATesla M10
AMDRadeon Pro 460 vs
AMDRadeon RX 550X
