AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs AMD Radeon Pro 460

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and AMD Radeon Pro 460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 931 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1011 MHz vs 907 MHz
• Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 80.88 GTexel / s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
• Around 39% better floating-point performance: 2,588 gflops vs 1,858 gflops
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3799 vs 3453
• Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19228 vs 15277
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.971 vs 44.089
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.247 vs 594.914
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.195 vs 3.46
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.289 vs 55.755
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 252.311 vs 226.93
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6318 vs 4664
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2070 vs 1842
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6318 vs 4664
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2070 vs 1842

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 460

• Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
• 3.6x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 1400 MHz
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 679 vs 483
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1514
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1514

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 460

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3799 3453
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	483 679
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	19228 15277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	58.971 44.089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1235.247 594.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.195 3.46
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.289 55.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	252.311 226.93
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6318 4664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2070 1842
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6318 4664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2070 1842
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 3346

Compare specifications (specs)