AMD Radeon Pro 460 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 460 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 460

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 15% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 738 MHz
• 4.9x more texture fill rate: 58.05 GTexel / s vs 11.81 GTexel / s
• 32x more pipelines: 1024 vs 32
• 15.8x better floating-point performance: 1,858 gflops vs 117.5 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
• Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
• 5x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 1008 MHz
• 20.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3453 vs 166
• 13.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 679 vs 51
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 55.755 vs 38.948
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1731
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1731

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM

• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 179.899 vs 44.089
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1813.265 vs 594.914
• 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.817 vs 3.46
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 757.451 vs 226.93
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3689 vs 1842
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3689 vs 1842

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 460
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3453 166
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	679 51
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.089 179.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	594.914 1813.265
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.46 13.817
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	55.755 38.948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	226.93 757.451
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1842 3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 1731
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1842 3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 1731

Compare specifications (specs)