AMD Radeon Pro 460 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 460 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 460

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 7% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 797 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 100 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 2% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 679 vs 554
• Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15336 vs 11903
• Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.089 vs 24.986
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.46 vs 2.362
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 55.755 vs 35.269
• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 226.93 vs 55.394

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

• Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 89.26 GTexel / s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
• Around 31% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 1024
• Around 15% better floating-point performance: 2,142 gflops vs 1,858 gflops
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3635 vs 3453
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 826.477 vs 594.914
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6030 vs 4664
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3657 vs 1842
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6030 vs 4664
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3657 vs 1842

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 460
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3453 3635
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	679 554
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	15336 11903
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.089 24.986
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	594.914 826.477
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.46 2.362
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	55.755 35.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	226.93 55.394
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4664 6030
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1842 3657
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4664 6030
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1842 3657
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3347

Compare specifications (specs)