AMD Radeon Pro 460 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 460 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 460
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 58.05 GTexel / s vs 49.4 billion / sec
- 2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 512
- Around 18% better floating-point performance: 1,858 gflops vs 1,581.1 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 7x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 244 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 2004 MHz (4008 data rate)
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 679 vs 490
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15290 vs 15182
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.089 vs 40.048
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 55.755 vs 32.378
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 226.93 vs 132.363
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 October 2016 vs 9 November 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 58.05 GTexel / s vs 49.4 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops vs 1,581.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 244 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1536 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 679 vs 490 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15290 vs 15182 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.089 vs 40.048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 55.755 vs 32.378 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 226.93 vs 132.363 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
- Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1544 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4630 vs 3453
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 872.651 vs 594.914
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.338 vs 3.46
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5953 vs 4664
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 1842
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5953 vs 4664
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 1842
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1544 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4630 vs 3453 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 872.651 vs 594.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.338 vs 3.46 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5953 vs 4664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 1842 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5953 vs 4664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 1842 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 460
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 460 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3453 | 4630 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 679 | 490 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15290 | 15182 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.089 | 40.048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 594.914 | 872.651 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.46 | 4.338 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 55.755 | 32.378 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 226.93 | 132.363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4664 | 5953 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1842 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4664 | 5953 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1842 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 809 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 460 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Baffin | GF110 |
| Launch date | 30 October 2016 | 9 November 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 618 | 620 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Price now | $289.88 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.21 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 907 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1544 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 1,581.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 58.05 GTexel / s | 49.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 244 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,000 million |
| CUDA cores | 512 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin and One 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB / s | 192.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
