AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 1033.1x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 96.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 71% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 7012 MHz
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 617 vs 457
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 21 February 2018 |
| Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s vs 96.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 7012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 617 vs 457 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1328 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1476 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 85 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32521 vs 29471
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12948 vs 7730
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12948 vs 7730
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3595
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3595
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8920 vs 5996
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1328 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1476 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 85 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32521 vs 29471 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12948 vs 7730 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12948 vs 7730 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3350 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8920 vs 5996 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29471 | 32521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7730 | 12948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7730 | 12948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3595 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3595 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 617 | 457 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5996 | 8920 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 14 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 21 February 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 354 | 334 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1476 MHz |
| Compute units | 20 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1328 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 200 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.400 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.200 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s | 96.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,098 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 168.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 7012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5300M with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
ATIFireGL V7700
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIATesla M6
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIATesla P4
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile
