AMD Radeon Pro 5500M vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5500M and Intel UHD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 2.9x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• 4333.3x more texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 64x more pipelines: 1536 vs 24
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
• 5.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6763 vs 1237
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 654 vs 299
• 8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 37259 vs 4657
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.82 vs 27.517
• 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1860.146 vs 354.254
• 6.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.238 vs 1.807
• 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.947 vs 20.323
• 20.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 596.819 vs 29.327
• 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9175 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3670 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3309
• 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9175 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3670 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3309
• 50.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3426 vs 68

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• 5.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 85 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6763 1237
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	654 299
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	37259 4657
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	105.82 27.517
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860.146 354.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.238 1.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.947 20.323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	596.819 29.327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9175 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9175 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3309
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3426 68

Compare specifications (specs)