AMD Radeon Pro 5500M versus Intel UHD Graphics 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 5500M and Intel UHD Graphics 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- 2.9x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 124.8 GTexel/s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
- 64x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 24
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 14 nm
- 5.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6763 versus 1237
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 654 versus 299
- 8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 37259 versus 4657
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.82 versus 27.517
- 5.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1860.146 versus 354.254
- 6.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.238 versus 1.807
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.947 versus 20.323
- 20.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 596.819 versus 29.327
- 4.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9175 versus 1870
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3670 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 3309
- 4.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9175 versus 1870
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3670 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 3309
- 50.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3426 versus 68
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 Nov 2019 versus 1 September 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 124.8 GTexel/s versus 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 24 |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 14 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6763 versus 1237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 654 versus 299 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 37259 versus 4657 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.82 versus 27.517 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1860.146 versus 354.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.238 versus 1.807 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.947 versus 20.323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 596.819 versus 29.327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9175 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9175 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3426 versus 68 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 5.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 85 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 85 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6763 | 1237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 654 | 299 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 37259 | 4657 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.82 | 27.517 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1860.146 | 354.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.238 | 1.807 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.947 | 20.323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 596.819 | 29.327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9175 | 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 | 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9175 | 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 | 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3426 | 68 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Nom de code | Navi 14 | Coffee Lake GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 13 Nov 2019 | 1 September 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 351 | 1234 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 24 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.994 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 24 |
| Pixel fill rate | 41.60 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 124.8 GTexel/s | 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 189 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro 5500M avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M vs
AMDRadeon E8870
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M vs
NVIDIATesla P4
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M vs
AMDRadeon RX 570X
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M vs
IntelArc A570M
