AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs AMD Radeon HD 6970M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555 and AMD Radeon HD 6970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 680 MHz
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 40.8 GTexel / s vs 32.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 42% higher memory clock speed: 5100 MHz vs 3600 MHz
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3141 vs 2270
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11389 vs 3349
- 6.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.301 vs 4.787
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.83 vs 0.927
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.388 vs 24.456
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.706 vs 117.801
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 4 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 680 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 40.8 GTexel / s vs 32.6 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,306 gflops vs 1,305.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5100 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3141 vs 2270 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 vs 656 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11389 vs 3349 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.301 vs 4.787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.83 vs 0.927 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.388 vs 24.456 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.706 vs 117.801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3342 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6970M
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 960 vs 768
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 617.819 vs 572.795
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3229 vs 2221
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3229 vs 2221
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 960 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 617.819 vs 572.795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3229 vs 2221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3229 vs 2221 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6970M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 555 | AMD Radeon HD 6970M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3141 | 2270 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 | 656 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11389 | 3349 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.301 | 4.787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 572.795 | 617.819 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.83 | 0.927 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.388 | 24.456 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.706 | 117.801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4042 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 | 3229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4042 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 | 3229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3342 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 555 | AMD Radeon HD 6970M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | Blackcomb |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 4 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 712 | 781 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 680 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,306 gflops | 1,305.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 960 |
Texture fill rate | 40.8 GTexel / s | 32.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 81.6 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5100 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |