AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
  • Around 48% better floating-point performance: 1,306 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3141 vs 1530
  • Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 562
  • 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11524 vs 4536
  • Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4042 vs 2475
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2221 vs 958
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 2304
  • Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4042 vs 2475
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2221 vs 958
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 2304
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 June 2017 vs 5 September 2014
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 768 vs 48
Floating-point performance 1,306 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3141 vs 1530
PassMark - G2D Mark 659 vs 562
Geekbench - OpenCL 11524 vs 4536
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4042 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2221 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3349 vs 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4042 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2221 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3349 vs 2304

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

  • Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 40.8 GTexel / s
  • 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Texture fill rate 55.2 GTexel / s vs 40.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3141
1530
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
659
562
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
11524
4536
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4042
2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2221
958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3349
2304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4042
2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2221
958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3349
2304
Name AMD Radeon Pro 555 Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
PassMark - G3D Mark 3141 1530
PassMark - G2D Mark 659 562
Geekbench - OpenCL 11524 4536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 31.301
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 572.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.83
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 26.388
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 162.706
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4042 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2221 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3349 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4042 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2221 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3349 2304

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 555 Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Generation 8.0
Code name Polaris 21 Broadwell GT3e
Launch date 5 June 2017 5 September 2014
Place in performance rating 705 808
Type Mobile workstation Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 850 MHz 300 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,306 gflops 883.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 768 48
Texture fill rate 40.8 GTexel / s 55.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 3,000 million 189 million
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x1
Laptop size large medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 81.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5100 MHz
Memory type GDDR5
Shared memory 0 1

Technologies

DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0
Quick Sync