AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
- Around 48% better floating-point performance: 1,306 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3141 vs 1530
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 562
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11524 vs 4536
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4042 vs 2475
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2221 vs 958
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 2304
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4042 vs 2475
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2221 vs 958
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 2304
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 5 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 1,306 gflops vs 883.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3141 vs 1530 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 vs 562 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11524 vs 4536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4042 vs 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 2304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4042 vs 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 2304 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 40.8 GTexel / s
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s vs 40.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 555 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3141 | 1530 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 | 562 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11524 | 4536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.301 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 572.795 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.83 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.388 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.706 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4042 | 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 | 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 2304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4042 | 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 | 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 2304 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 555 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | Broadwell GT3e |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 5 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 705 | 808 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,306 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 40.8 GTexel / s | 55.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 189 million |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 81.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5100 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 | ||
Quick Sync |