AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 555

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
1020x more memory clock speed: 5100 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 521
Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.706 vs 133.458
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 3329
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 3329

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 June 2017 vs 18 February 2014
Pipelines	768 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	5100 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	659 vs 521
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	162.706 vs 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3349 vs 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3349 vs 3329

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 850 MHz
Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 40.8 GTexel / s
Around 6% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 1,306 gflops
Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 3141
Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 31.301
Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 572.795
Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 2.83
Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 vs 26.388
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 4042
Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 2221
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 4042
Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 2221

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1020 MHz vs 850 MHz
Texture fill rate	43.4 GTexel / s vs 40.8 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops vs 1,306 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3901 vs 3141
Geekbench - OpenCL	11526 vs 11524
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	42.463 vs 31.301
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	642.715 vs 572.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.933 vs 2.83
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	26.532 vs 26.388
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4843 vs 4042
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3683 vs 2221
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4843 vs 4042
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3683 vs 2221

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3141

3901

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

659

521

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

11524

11526

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31.301

42.463

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

572.795

642.715

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.83

2.933

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

26.388

26.532

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

162.706

133.458

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4042

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2221

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3349

3329

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4042

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2221

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3349

3329

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 555	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	3141	3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	659	521
Geekbench - OpenCL	11524	11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	31.301	42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	572.795	642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.83	2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	26.388	26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	162.706	133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4042	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2221	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3349	3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4042	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2221	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3349	3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		117

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 555	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell
Code name	Polaris 21	GM107
Launch date	5 June 2017	18 February 2014
Place in performance rating	705	707
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$149
Price now		$299.01
Value for money (0-100)		15.02
Technical info
Core clock speed	850 MHz	1020 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,306 gflops	1,389 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	768	640
Texture fill rate	40.8 GTexel / s	43.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	60 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	1,870 million
Boost clock speed		1085 MHz
CUDA cores		640
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		5.7" (14.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	81.6 GB / s	86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5100 MHz	5.4 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
TXAA