AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and AMD Radeon Pro 5500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 164.8 GTexel/s vs 124.8 GTexel/s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1536
- Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 85 Watt
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47784 vs 37259
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10296 vs 9175
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10296 vs 9175
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3670
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3670
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 678 vs 654
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9198 vs 6763
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 vs 13 Nov 2019 |
Texture fill rate | 164.8 GTexel/s vs 124.8 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1536 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47784 vs 37259 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10296 vs 9175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10296 vs 9175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3670 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3670 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3353 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 678 vs 654 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9198 vs 6763 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- 15.6x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | AMD Radeon Pro 5500M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47784 | 37259 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10296 | 9175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10296 | 9175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3670 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3670 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3353 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 678 | 654 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9198 | 6763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.82 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1860.146 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.238 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.947 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 596.819 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3426 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | Navi 12 | Navi 14 |
Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 | 13 Nov 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 282 | 351 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 329.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.55 TFLOPS (2:1) | 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.274 TFLOPS | 3.994 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1536 |
Pixel fill rate | 65.92 GPixel/s | 41.60 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 164.8 GTexel/s | 124.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 85 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 394.2 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) | 12000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |