AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • 920.7x more texture fill rate: 164.8 GTexel/s vs 179.0 GTexel / s
  • Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 130 Watt
  • Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 48365 vs 38420
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3575
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3575
  • Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9313 vs 7885
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 15 Jun 2020 vs 10 November 2016
Texture fill rate 164.8 GTexel/s vs 179.0 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2560 vs 2304
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 130 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 48365 vs 38420
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 3575
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 3575
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 vs 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 vs 3347
PassMark - G3D Mark 9313 vs 7885

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

  • Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1030 MHz
  • 9.1x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
  • Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 812 vs 687
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1188 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed 1243 MHz vs 1030 MHz
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10320 vs 10296
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10320 vs 10296
PassMark - G2D Mark 812 vs 687

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
48365
38420
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10296
10320
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10296
10320
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3575
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3575
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
3347
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
3347
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
687
812
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
9313
7885
Name AMD Radeon Pro 5600M AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Geekbench - OpenCL 48365 38420
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10296 10320
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10296 10320
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 3575
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 3575
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 3347
PassMark - G2D Mark 687 812
PassMark - G3D Mark 9313 7885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 115.834
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1987.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 10.152
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 105.263
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 597.677

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 5600M AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 GCN 4.0
Code name Navi 12 Ellesmere
Launch date 15 Jun 2020 10 November 2016
Place in performance rating 271 309
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $799
Price now $539.99
Value for money (0-100) 19.25

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1030 MHz 1243 MHz
Compute units 40
Core clock speed 1000 MHz 1188 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 329.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 10.55 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.274 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560 2304
Pixel fill rate 65.92 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 164.8 GTexel/s 179.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 130 Watt
Floating-point performance 5,728 gflops
Transistor count 5,700 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin
Width IGP
Length 241 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 394.2 GB/s 224.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 2048 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) 7000 MHz
Memory type HBM2 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0