AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs AMD Radeon R9 390X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and AMD Radeon R9 390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

AMD Radeon R9 390X

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
891.8x more texture fill rate: 164.8 GTexel/s vs 184.8 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
5.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 275 Watt

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	15 Jun 2020 vs 18 June 2015
Texture fill rate	164.8 GTexel/s vs 184.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 275 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354 vs 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354 vs 3350

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390X

Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1030 MHz
Around 10% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2560
Around 36% higher memory clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11675 vs 10296
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11675 vs 10296
Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 825 vs 681
Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9408 vs 9233

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz vs 1030 MHz
Pipelines	2816 vs 2560
Memory clock speed	1050 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11675 vs 10296
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11675 vs 10296
PassMark - G2D Mark	825 vs 681
PassMark - G3D Mark	9408 vs 9233

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10296

11675

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10296

11675

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3706

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3706

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3350

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3350

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

681

825

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

9233

9408

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5600M	AMD Radeon R9 390X
Geekbench - OpenCL	47730
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10296	11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10296	11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3706
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354	3350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354	3350
PassMark - G2D Mark	681	825
PassMark - G3D Mark	9233	9408
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		114.288
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		2911.861
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		10.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		118.411
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		683.568
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		4242

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5600M	AMD Radeon R9 390X
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	GCN 2.0
Code name	Navi 12	Grenada
Launch date	15 Jun 2020	18 June 2015
Place in performance rating	286	284
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$429
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1030 MHz	1050 MHz
Compute units	40	44
Core clock speed	1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	329.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	10.55 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	5.274 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560	2816
Pixel fill rate	65.92 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	164.8 GTexel/s	184.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	275 Watt
Floating-point performance		5,914 gflops
Stream Processors		2816
Transistor count		6,200 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin
Width	IGP
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Length		275 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Mantle
Memory
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	394.2 GB/s	384 GB/s
Memory bus width	2048 bit	512 bit
Memory clock speed	770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)	1050 MHz
Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore