AMD Radeon Pro 560X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560X and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 75% higher core clock speed: 1004 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 42.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 24
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
- 4.2x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 12x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3678 vs 306
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 711 vs 309
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 vs 1 March 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1004 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 24 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 90 nm |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3678 vs 306 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 vs 309 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 560X | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3678 | 306 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 | 309 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17520 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 48.494 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 679.583 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.96 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 62.405 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5367 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2495 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5367 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2495 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 560X | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Curie |
Code name | Polaris 21 | G71 |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 | 1 March 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 541 | 511 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99.99 | |
Price now | $99.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.97 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1004 MHz | 575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 24 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 278 million |
Boost clock speed | 575 MHz | |
Texture fill rate | 13.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-III |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 700 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | 256 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 |