AMD Radeon Pro 560X vs AMD FirePro M6000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560X and AMD FirePro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro 560X

AMD FirePro M6000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560X

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1004 MHz vs 800 MHz
Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 4000 MHz
2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3678 vs 1820
2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17562 vs 8095
Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5367 vs 3024
Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2495 vs 1832
Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5367 vs 3024
Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2495 vs 1832

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	16 July 2018 vs 1 July 2012
Core clock speed	1004 MHz vs 800 MHz
Pipelines	1024 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3678 vs 1820
Geekbench - OpenCL	17562 vs 8095
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5367 vs 3024
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2495 vs 1832
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5367 vs 3024
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2495 vs 1832

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6000

Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 43 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 776 vs 711

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	43 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	776 vs 711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357 vs 3351

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M6000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3678

1820

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

711

776

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

17562

8095

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5367

3024

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2495

1832

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3351

3357

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5367

3024

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2495

1832

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3351

3357

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 560X	AMD FirePro M6000
PassMark - G3D Mark	3678	1820
PassMark - G2D Mark	711	776
Geekbench - OpenCL	17562	8095
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	48.494
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	679.583
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.96
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	62.405
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	247.728
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5367	3024
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2495	1832
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3351	3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5367	3024
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2495	1832
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3351	3357

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 560X	AMD FirePro M6000
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Polaris 21	Heathrow
Launch date	16 July 2018	1 July 2012
Place in performance rating	546	543
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Core clock speed	1004 MHz	800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1024	640
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	43 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	1,500 million
Floating-point performance		1,024 gflops
Texture fill rate		32 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
StereoOutput3D
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Bus support		n / a
Form factor		MXM-B
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Memory
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB
Memory bandwidth		72 GB / s
Shared memory		0