AMD Radeon Pro 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 112.0 GTexel / s vs 43.9 billion / sec
- 3.7x more pipelines: 1792 vs 480
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 3,584 gflops vs 1,405.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 219 Watt
- 3.2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1280 MB
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 1900 MHz (3800 data rate)
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6337 vs 3924
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 697 vs 473
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 30276 vs 13617
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 74.958 vs 36.849
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1070.209 vs 736.185
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.94 vs 4.369
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 89.457 vs 40.08
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 436.958 vs 122.953
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7664 vs 4862
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3325
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7664 vs 4862
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3325
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 7 December 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 112.0 GTexel / s vs 43.9 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 480 |
Floating-point performance | 3,584 gflops vs 1,405.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 219 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1280 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz vs 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6337 vs 3924 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 697 vs 473 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 30276 vs 13617 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.958 vs 36.849 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1070.209 vs 736.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.94 vs 4.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.457 vs 40.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 436.958 vs 122.953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7664 vs 4862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7664 vs 4862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3325 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1464 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3668 vs 2340
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3668 vs 2340
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1464 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3668 vs 2340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3668 vs 2340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6337 | 3924 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 697 | 473 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 30276 | 13617 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.958 | 36.849 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1070.209 | 736.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.94 | 4.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.457 | 40.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 436.958 | 122.953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7664 | 4862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2340 | 3668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7664 | 4862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2340 | 3668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GF110 |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 7 December 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 436 | 734 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Price now | $99.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 48.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1105 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1464 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,584 gflops | 1,405.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 112.0 GTexel / s | 43.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 219 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 3,000 million |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1280 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB / s | 152.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |