AMD Radeon Pro 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 570

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 837 MHz
• Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1105 MHz vs 876 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 1133.3x more memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 697 vs 630
• Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 30299 vs 23870
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 74.958 vs 62.027
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.94 vs 5.835
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 89.457 vs 36.842
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 436.958 vs 215.546

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

• Around 67% higher texture fill rate: 187.5 billion / sec vs 112.0 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 2688 vs 1792
• Around 31% better floating-point performance: 4,709 gflops vs 3,584 gflops
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8190 vs 6337
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1218.137 vs 1070.209
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10176 vs 7664
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2340
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10176 vs 7664
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2340

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6337 8190
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	697 630
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	30299 23870
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	74.958 62.027
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1070.209 1218.137
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.94 5.835
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	89.457 36.842
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	436.958 215.546
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7664 10176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2340 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7664 10176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2340 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3356

Compare specifications (specs)