AMD Radeon Pro 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 837 MHz
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1105 MHz vs 876 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 1133.3x more memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 697 vs 636
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 30269 vs 24431
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 74.958 vs 62.027
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.94 vs 5.835
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 89.457 vs 36.842
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 436.958 vs 215.546
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 19 February 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 837 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1105 MHz vs 876 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 697 vs 636 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 30269 vs 24431 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.958 vs 62.027 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.94 vs 5.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.457 vs 36.842 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 436.958 vs 215.546 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
- Around 67% higher texture fill rate: 187.5 billion / sec vs 112.0 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 2688 vs 1792
- Around 31% better floating-point performance: 4,709 gflops vs 3,584 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8194 vs 6337
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1218.137 vs 1070.209
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10176 vs 7664
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2340
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10176 vs 7664
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2340
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 187.5 billion / sec vs 112.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2688 vs 1792 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,709 gflops vs 3,584 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8194 vs 6337 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1218.137 vs 1070.209 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10176 vs 7664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 2340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10176 vs 7664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 2340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6337 | 8194 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 697 | 636 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 30269 | 24431 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.958 | 62.027 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1070.209 | 1218.137 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.94 | 5.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.457 | 36.842 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 436.958 | 215.546 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7664 | 10176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2340 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7664 | 10176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2340 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2901 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | GK110 |
| Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 19 February 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 436 | 438 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Price now | $2,054.59 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.09 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1105 MHz | 876 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 837 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 3,584 gflops | 4,709 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 2688 |
| Texture fill rate | 112.0 GTexel / s | 187.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | 7,080 million |
| CUDA cores | 2688 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 570 with others
AMDRadeon Pro 570 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300 + nForce 730i
AMDRadeon Pro 570 vs
ATIFirePro V8700
AMDRadeon Pro 570 vs
AMDFirePro S10000
AMDRadeon Pro 570 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN
AMDRadeon Pro 570 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro 570 vs
NVIDIAP106-100
