AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs AMD Radeon Pro 580
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and AMD Radeon Pro 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 1007.3x more texture fill rate: 194.4 GTexel/s vs 193.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 61% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64325 vs 40070
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18549 vs 10113
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18549 vs 10113
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 2900
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 2900
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 5 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 194.4 GTexel/s vs 193.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64325 vs 40070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 vs 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 vs 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 6780 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Memory clock speed | 6780 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 580
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | AMD Radeon Pro 580 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64325 | 40070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 | 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 | 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3353 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 943 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 109.521 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1206.829 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.88 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.944 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.984 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | AMD Radeon Pro 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 5 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 227 | 311 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 388.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.44 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.221 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Texture fill rate | 194.4 GTexel/s | 193.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 5,700 million |
Floating-point performance | 6,175 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 256.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 6780 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |