AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon Pro 5700

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1300 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
96.2x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 12500 million
Around 91% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64325 vs 53770
Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18549 vs 11925
Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18549 vs 11925

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	4 Aug 2020 vs 19 March 2019
Core clock speed	1243 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz vs 1300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	130 Watt vs 12500 million
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	64325 vs 53770
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	18549 vs 11925
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	18549 vs 11925

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 194.4 GTexel/s
Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 vs 3718
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 vs 3718
3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 3359
3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 3359

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	249.6 GTexel/s vs 194.4 GTexel/s
Pipelines	3072 vs 2304
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3947 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3947 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	10411 vs 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	10411 vs 3359

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

64325

53770

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

18549

11925

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

18549

11925

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3947

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3947

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

10411

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

10411

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5700	AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Geekbench - OpenCL	64325	53770
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	18549	11925
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	18549	11925
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	3947
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	3947
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	10411
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	10411
PassMark - G3D Mark		11300
PassMark - G2D Mark		784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		135.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		3063.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		12.678
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		883.876

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5700	AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Vega 10 PRO
Code name	Navi 10	Greenland
Launch date	4 Aug 2020	19 March 2019
Place in performance rating	238	236
Type	Desktop	Desktop
GCN generation		GCN 5.0
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	1300 MHz
Compute units	36
Core clock speed	1243 MHz	1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	388.8 GFLOPS (1:16)	499.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	12.44 TFLOPS (2:1)	15.97 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	6.221 TFLOPS	7.987 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	3072
Pixel fill rate	86.40 GPixel/s	83.20 GPixel/s
Render output units	64
Texture fill rate	194.4 GTexel/s	249.6 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	130 Watt	12500 million
Transistor count	10300 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None
Width	IGP
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.1
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5	6.3
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	384.0 GB/s	402.4 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit	2048 bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)	786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
Memory type	GDDR6	HBM2
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Technologies
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)