AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 96.2x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 12500 million
- Around 91% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64325 vs 53770
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18549 vs 11925
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18549 vs 11925
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 19 March 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 12500 million |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64325 vs 53770 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 vs 11925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 vs 11925 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 194.4 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 vs 3718
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 vs 3718
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 3359
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 3359
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 194.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64325 | 53770 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 | 11925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 | 11925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 10411 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 10411 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Vega 10 PRO |
Code name | Navi 10 | Greenland |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 19 March 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 238 | 237 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
GCN generation | GCN 5.0 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 388.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 499.2 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.44 TFLOPS (2:1) | 15.97 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.221 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | 83.20 GPixel/s |
Render output units | 64 | |
Texture fill rate | 194.4 GTexel/s | 249.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 12500 million |
Transistor count | 10300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 402.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |