AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 562.5x more texture fill rate: 194.4 GTexel/s vs 345.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18549 vs 13339
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18549 vs 13339
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 27 June 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 194.4 GTexel/s vs 345.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 vs 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 vs 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 1572 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71298 vs 64325
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1572 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71298 vs 64325 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64325 | 71298 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 | 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 | 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3353 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12920 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 142.691 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1729.558 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.693 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 27 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 238 | 241 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 388.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.44 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.221 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Texture fill rate | 194.4 GTexel/s | 345.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 11,059 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 402.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1572 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |