AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 5700

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1050 MHz
723.2x more texture fill rate: 194.4 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
2.1x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 275 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1050 MHz
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18549 vs 8673
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18549 vs 8673

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	4 Aug 2020 vs 24 June 2015
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Texture fill rate	194.4 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	130 Watt vs 275 Watt
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1050 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	18549 vs 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	18549 vs 8673

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 vs 3718
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 vs 3718

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	4096 vs 2304
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8925 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8925 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361 vs 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361 vs 3359

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

18549

8673

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

18549

8673

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

8925

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

8925

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3361

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3361

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5700	AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Geekbench - OpenCL	64325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	18549	8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	18549	8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	8925
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	3361
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	3361
PassMark - G3D Mark		9580
PassMark - G2D Mark		799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		155.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		3431.249
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		12.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		153.089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		857.575
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		5170

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5700	AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	GCN 3.0
Code name	Navi 10	Fiji
Launch date	4 Aug 2020	24 June 2015
Place in performance rating	238	236
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$649
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	1050 MHz
Compute units	36	64
Core clock speed	1243 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	388.8 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	12.44 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	6.221 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	4096
Pixel fill rate	86.40 GPixel/s
Render output units	64
Texture fill rate	194.4 GTexel/s	268.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	130 Watt	275 Watt
Transistor count	10300 million	8,900 million
Floating-point performance		8,602 gflops
Stream Processors		4096
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin
Width	IGP
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Length		191 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Mantle
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	384.0 GB/s	512 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit	4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)	1050 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)