AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and NVIDIA Quadro P2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 194.4 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64325 vs 31476
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18549 vs 11437
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18549 vs 11437
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1676
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1676
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 10 June 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 194.4 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1280 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 5 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64325 vs 31476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 vs 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 vs 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 1676 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 1676 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 130 Watt
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64325 | 31476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 | 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 | 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 1676 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 1676 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9321 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 919 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 10 | GP106 |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 10 June 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 227 | 304 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 388.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 119.4 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.44 TFLOPS (2:1) | 59.72 GFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.221 TFLOPS | 3.822 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | 59.72 GPixel/s |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture fill rate | 194.4 GTexel/s | 119.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 4400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 201 mm (7.9") | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 5 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 200.2 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 160 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5700 with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850M
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
NVIDIATesla P40
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1630
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
