AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 33.5x more texture fill rate: 140.8 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 128 MB
- 5.7x more memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 1200 MHz
| Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 20 April 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 1096 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 140.8 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 120 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 560
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 575 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34732 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.154 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1090.128 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.349 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 539.686 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9613 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2814 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9613 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2814 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 114 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 360 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 575 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 560 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Curie |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | G73 |
| Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 20 April 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 471 | 472 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
| Price now | $150.25 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 0.98 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1096 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 4,506 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | |
| Texture fill rate | 140.8 GTexel / s | 4.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | 177 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 198 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |