AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575 and NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

AMD Radeon Pro 575

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 1025 MHz
2.1x more texture fill rate: 140.8 GTexel / s vs 65.6 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
2.1x better floating-point performance: 4,506 gflops vs 2,099 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 24% higher memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 5500 MHz
2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34732 vs 16429
Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9613 vs 6337
Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9613 vs 6337

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 June 2017 vs 11 January 2017
Core clock speed	1096 MHz vs 1025 MHz
Texture fill rate	140.8 GTexel / s vs 65.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2048 vs 1024
Floating-point performance	4,506 gflops vs 2,099 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	6800 MHz vs 5500 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	34732 vs 16429
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9613 vs 6337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9613 vs 6337

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

2.2x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 120 Watt
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2814
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2814

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 120 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 2814
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 2814
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3352

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

34732

16429

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9613

6337

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2814

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9613

6337

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2814

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3358

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 575	NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
Geekbench - OpenCL	34732	16429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	86.154
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1090.128
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	7.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	98.349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	539.686
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9613	6337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2814	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9613	6337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2814	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3358
PassMark - G2D Mark		380
PassMark - G3D Mark		4284

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 575	NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Polaris 20	GM206
Launch date	5 June 2017	11 January 2017
Place in performance rating	471	473
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Technical info
Core clock speed	1096 MHz	1025 MHz
Floating-point performance	4,506 gflops	2,099 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2048	1024
Texture fill rate	140.8 GTexel / s	65.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	120 Watt	55 Watt
Transistor count	5,700 million	2,940 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	241 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	217.6 GB / s	88 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6800 MHz	5500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5