AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro 575

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 823 MHz
2.7x more texture fill rate: 140.8 GTexel / s vs 52.7 GTexel / s
5.3x more pipelines: 2048 vs 384
3.6x better floating-point performance: 4,506 gflops vs 1,263.4 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
Around 42% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 170 Watt
4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
Around 70% higher memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 4008 MHz
2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9613 vs 3362
2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9613 vs 3362

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 June 2017 vs 8 March 2011
Core clock speed	1096 MHz vs 823 MHz
Texture fill rate	140.8 GTexel / s vs 52.7 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2048 vs 384
Floating-point performance	4,506 gflops vs 1,263.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	120 Watt vs 170 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	6800 MHz vs 4008 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9613 vs 3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9613 vs 3362

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM

2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6895 vs 2814
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6895 vs 2814

Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	6895 vs 2814
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	6895 vs 2814

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9613

3362

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2814

6895

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9613

3362

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2814

6895

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 575	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
Geekbench - OpenCL	34732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	86.154
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1090.128
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	7.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	98.349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	539.686
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9613	3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2814	6895
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9613	3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2814	6895
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3352

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 575	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Polaris 20	GF114
Launch date	5 June 2017	8 March 2011
Place in performance rating	471	470
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Technical info
Core clock speed	1096 MHz	823 MHz
Floating-point performance	4,506 gflops	1,263.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	2048	384
Texture fill rate	140.8 GTexel / s	52.7 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	120 Watt	170 Watt
Transistor count	5,700 million	1,950 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	241 mm	229 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	217.6 GB / s	128.3 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6800 MHz	4008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5