AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs AMD Radeon HD 8760 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575 and AMD Radeon HD 8760 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 140.8 GTexel / s vs 40 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 640
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 4,506 gflops vs 1,280 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 51% higher memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 4500 MHz
Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 8 January 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1096 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 140.8 GTexel / s vs 40 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 4,506 gflops vs 1,280 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8760 OEM
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 45762 vs 34732
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45762 vs 34732 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8760 OEM
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 575 | AMD Radeon HD 8760 OEM |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34732 | 45762 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.154 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1090.128 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.349 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 539.686 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9613 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2814 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9613 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2814 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 575 | AMD Radeon HD 8760 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | Cape Verde |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 8 January 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 471 | 468 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1096 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,506 gflops | 1,280 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 140.8 GTexel / s | 40 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 210 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |