AMD Radeon Pro 580 vs ATI FirePro RG220

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 580 and ATI FirePro RG220 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 2.2x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 500 MHz
  • 48.3x more texture fill rate: 193.0 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s
  • 28.8x more pipelines: 2304 vs 80
  • 77.2x better floating-point performance: 6,175 gflops vs 80 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
  • 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
  • 4.2x more memory clock speed: 6780 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • 23.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7753 vs 335
  • Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 943 vs 552
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 June 2017 vs 1 May 2008
Core clock speed 1100 MHz vs 500 MHz
Texture fill rate 193.0 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2304 vs 80
Floating-point performance 6,175 gflops vs 80 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 55 nm
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 6780 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 7753 vs 335
PassMark - G2D Mark 943 vs 552

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro RG220

  • 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 150 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 150 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 580
GPU 2: ATI FirePro RG220

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
7753
335
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
943
552
Name AMD Radeon Pro 580 ATI FirePro RG220
PassMark - G3D Mark 7753 335
PassMark - G2D Mark 943 552
Geekbench - OpenCL 40069
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 109.521
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1206.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 9.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 117.944
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 511.984
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10113
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2900
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10113
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2900
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 580 ATI FirePro RG220

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 TeraScale
Code name Polaris 20 RV711
Launch date 5 June 2017 1 May 2008
Place in performance rating 311 251
Type Workstation Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz
Core clock speed 1100 MHz 500 MHz
Floating-point performance 6,175 gflops 80 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 55 nm
Pipelines 2304 80
Texture fill rate 193.0 GTexel / s 4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 5,700 million 242 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DMS-59

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 241 mm
Supplementary power connectors None None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 10.1
OpenGL 4.5 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 256.0 GB / s 51.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 6780 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3