AMD Radeon Pro 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1075 MHz
  • Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 193.0 GTexel / s vs 192 billion / sec
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • 968.6x more memory clock speed: 6780 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
  • Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 943 vs 835
  • 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.944 vs 38.225
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10113 vs 9834
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10113 vs 9834
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 June 2017 vs 17 March 2015
Core clock speed 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed 1200 MHz vs 1075 MHz
Texture fill rate 193.0 GTexel / s vs 192 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed 6780 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 943 vs 835
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 117.944 vs 38.225
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10113 vs 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10113 vs 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3343

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
  • Around 8% better floating-point performance: 6,691 gflops vs 6,175 gflops
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12925 vs 7753
  • Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41155 vs 40270
  • Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.231 vs 109.521
  • Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1722.566 vs 1206.829
  • Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.245 vs 9.88
  • Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 518.554 vs 511.984
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3700 vs 2900
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3700 vs 2900
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 3072 vs 2304
Floating-point performance 6,691 gflops vs 6,175 gflops
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 12925 vs 7753
Geekbench - OpenCL 41155 vs 40270
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 157.231 vs 109.521
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1722.566 vs 1206.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 12.245 vs 9.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 518.554 vs 511.984
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3700 vs 2900
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3700 vs 2900

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
7753
12925
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
943
835
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
40270
41155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
109.521
157.231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1206.829
1722.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9.88
12.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
117.944
38.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
511.984
518.554
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10113
9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2900
3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10113
9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2900
3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3343
Name AMD Radeon Pro 580 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
PassMark - G3D Mark 7753 12925
PassMark - G2D Mark 943 835
Geekbench - OpenCL 40270 41155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 109.521 157.231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1206.829 1722.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 9.88 12.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 117.944 38.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 511.984 518.554
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10113 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2900 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10113 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2900 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 5307

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 580 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Maxwell 2.0
Code name Polaris 20 GM200
Launch date 5 June 2017 17 March 2015
Place in performance rating 330 327
Type Workstation Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Price now $1,999.99
Value for money (0-100) 7.38

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 1075 MHz
Core clock speed 1100 MHz 1000 MHz
Floating-point performance 6,175 gflops 6,691 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 2304 3072
Texture fill rate 193.0 GTexel / s 192 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 5,700 million 8,000 million
CUDA cores 3072

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 241 mm 10.5" (26.7 cm)
Supplementary power connectors None 6-pin + 8-pin
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 600 Watt
SLI options 4x

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Memory bandwidth 256.0 GB / s 336.5 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 6780 MHz 7.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost