AMD Radeon Pro 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1075 MHz
• Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 193.0 GTexel / s vs 192 billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 968.6x more memory clock speed: 6780 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 943 vs 834
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.944 vs 38.225
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10113 vs 9834
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10113 vs 9834

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

• Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
• Around 8% better floating-point performance: 6,691 gflops vs 6,175 gflops
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12929 vs 7753
• Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41155 vs 40259
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.231 vs 109.521
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1722.566 vs 1206.829
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.245 vs 9.88
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 518.554 vs 511.984
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3700 vs 2900
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3700 vs 2900

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7753 12929
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	943 834
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	40259 41155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	109.521 157.231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1206.829 1722.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.88 12.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	117.944 38.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	511.984 518.554
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10113 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2900 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10113 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2900 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3343

Compare specifications (specs)