AMD Radeon Pro 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 847.5x more memory clock speed: 6780 MHz vs 8 GB/s
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 943 vs 603
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.944 vs 28.289
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 15 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Memory clock speed | 6780 MHz vs 8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 943 vs 603 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.944 vs 28.289 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 210.6 GTexel / s vs 193.0 GTexel / s
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 6,738 gflops vs 6,175 gflops
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10465 vs 7753
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 44918 vs 40072
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.951 vs 109.521
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1718.593 vs 1206.829
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.283 vs 9.88
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 710.366 vs 511.984
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 vs 10113
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 2900
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 vs 10113
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 2900
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 210.6 GTexel / s vs 193.0 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops vs 6,175 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 vs 7753 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44918 vs 40072 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 vs 109.521 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 vs 1206.829 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 vs 9.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 vs 511.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 vs 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 vs 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 2900 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 | 10465 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 943 | 603 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 40072 | 44918 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 109.521 | 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1206.829 | 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.88 | 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.944 | 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.984 | 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10113 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2900 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10113 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2900 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5526 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GP104B |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 311 | 312 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $389.99 | |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1645 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 6,175 gflops | 6,738 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 193.0 GTexel / s | 210.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB / s | 256 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6780 MHz | 8 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |